lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:24:35 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <>
Cc:	Maxim Levitsky <>,,
	LKML <>,
	"linux-mm" <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)

Am Sonntag, 17. Januar 2010 01:38:37 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Now having said that, we've been considering a change that will turn all
> > GFP_KERNEL allocations into GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume, so perhaps I'll
> > prepare a patch to do that and let's see what people think.
> If I didn't confuse anything (which is likely, because it's a bit late here
> now), the patch below should do the trick.  I have only checked that it doesn't
> break compilation, so please take it with a grain of salt.
> Comments welcome.

I think this is a bad idea as it makes the mm subsystem behave differently
in the runtime and in the whole system cases. What's so hard about telling
people that they need to use GFP_NOIO in suspend() and resume()?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists