[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263817164.4283.394.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:19:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix the is_software_event() definition
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:07 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> But then Stephane will need to update his patch and use
> something else than is_software_event() to guess if an event
> needs its pmu->enable/disable to be called.
Yes, that's what I told him before and even send a patch for, the name I
chose was is_x86_event().
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/12/154
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists