[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B54B656.2090307@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:28:22 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/64] ide: add drive->pio_mode field
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: add drive->pio_mode field
>
> Add pio_mode field to ide_drive_t matching pio_mode field used in
> struct ata_device.
>
> The validity of the field is restricted to ->set_pio_mode method
> only currently in IDE subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c | 2 ++
> drivers/ide/ide-probe.c | 2 ++
> drivers/ide/ide-xfer-mode.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/ide.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-devsets.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ static int set_pio_mode(ide_drive_t *dri
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> if (set_pio_mode_abuse(drive->hwif, arg)) {
> + drive->pio_mode = arg + XFER_PIO_0;
> +
>
Er, didn't understand this... these 'arg' values are not really PIO
modes, no?
> if (arg == 8 || arg == 9) {
> unsigned long flags;
>
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists