[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263844770.26846.134.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:59:30 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video/matrox: Checkpatch cleanups for matroxfb_crtc2.c
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:27 +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> the reason behind this change was that spaces and tabs were mixed for
> indention.
Checkpatch isn't gospel and isn't always right.
There should be room for taste preference here
and I think whatever Petr V's is should prevail.
> How about this indention? Would this be better?
Well, I don't think so, but others will have different opinions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists