[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100118221146.5d81fc0e@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:11:46 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video/matrox: Checkpatch cleanups for matroxfb_crtc2.c
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:59:30 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:27 +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> > the reason behind this change was that spaces and tabs were mixed for
> > indention.
>
> Checkpatch isn't gospel and isn't always right.
>
> There should be room for taste preference here
> and I think whatever Petr V's is should prevail.
>
> > How about this indention? Would this be better?
>
> Well, I don't think so, but others will have different opinions.
I don't see it as an improvement either. Was checkpatch.pl really
complaining about the alignment? Tabs followed by less than 8 spaces is
acceptable and fairly common AFAICT, I can't remember the script
yelling at me when I do it.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists