[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100120184707.ed99b540.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:47:07 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] memcg use generic percpu allocator instead of
private one
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:07:52 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 12:48 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > This patch is onto mmotm Jan/15.
> > =
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> > When per-cpu counter for memcg was implemneted, dynamic percpu allocator
> > was not very good. But now, we have good one and useful macros.
> > This patch replaces memcg's private percpu counter implementation with
> > generic dynamic percpu allocator and macros.
> >
> > The benefits are
> > - We can remove private implementation.
> > - The counters will be NUMA-aware. (Current one is not...)
> > - This patch reduces sizeof(struct mem_cgroup). Then,
> > struct mem_cgroup may be fit in page size on small config.
> >
> > By this, size of text is reduced.
> > [Before]
> > [kamezawa@...extal mmotm-2.6.33-Jan15]$ size mm/memcontrol.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 24373 2528 4132 31033 7939 mm/memcontrol.o
> > [After]
> > [kamezawa@...extal mmotm-2.6.33-Jan15]$ size mm/memcontrol.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 23913 2528 4132 30573 776d mm/memcontrol.o
> >
> > This includes no functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
>
> Before review, could you please post parallel pagefault data on a large
> system, since root now uses these per cpu counters and its overhead is
> now dependent on these counters. Also the data read from root cgroup is
> also dependent on these, could you make sure that is not broken.
>
No number difference before/after patch on my SMP quick test.
But I don't have NUMA. Could you test on NUMA ?
I'll measure again tomorrow if I have machine time.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists