[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B56FB33.2090408@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:16:43 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] memcg use generic percpu allocator instead of private
one
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 03:17 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:07:52 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 12:48 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> This patch is onto mmotm Jan/15.
>>> =
>>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> When per-cpu counter for memcg was implemneted, dynamic percpu allocator
>>> was not very good. But now, we have good one and useful macros.
>>> This patch replaces memcg's private percpu counter implementation with
>>> generic dynamic percpu allocator and macros.
>>>
>>> The benefits are
>>> - We can remove private implementation.
>>> - The counters will be NUMA-aware. (Current one is not...)
>>> - This patch reduces sizeof(struct mem_cgroup). Then,
>>> struct mem_cgroup may be fit in page size on small config.
>>>
>>> By this, size of text is reduced.
>>> [Before]
>>> [kamezawa@...extal mmotm-2.6.33-Jan15]$ size mm/memcontrol.o
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 24373 2528 4132 31033 7939 mm/memcontrol.o
>>> [After]
>>> [kamezawa@...extal mmotm-2.6.33-Jan15]$ size mm/memcontrol.o
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 23913 2528 4132 30573 776d mm/memcontrol.o
>>>
>>> This includes no functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>>
>> Before review, could you please post parallel pagefault data on a large
>> system, since root now uses these per cpu counters and its overhead is
>> now dependent on these counters. Also the data read from root cgroup is
>> also dependent on these, could you make sure that is not broken.
>>
> No number difference before/after patch on my SMP quick test.
> But I don't have NUMA. Could you test on NUMA ?
>
> I'll measure again tomorrow if I have machine time.
I'll do the same as well if possible.
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists