[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B570EDD.6000808@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:10:37 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: mtosatti@...hat.com, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm: fix spurious interrupt with irqfd
On 01/19/2010 04:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:42:50PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2010 07:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> Deassigning irqfd and assigning back caused spurious interrupt. fix this
>>> by clearing the counter on deassign. This is on top of davidel's patch
>>> which makes clearing eventfd counter from modules possible.
>>>
>>>
>> Applied both, thanks.
>>
> Hmm, I see this in kvm master. Avi/Marcelo, since this is a bugfix, can
> you queue this patchset for 2.6.33 and 2.6.32 stable as well please?
>
I'm uncomfortable with pushing Davide's patch into stable and possibly
causing regressions with unrelated applications. Can't a guest live
with a spurious interrupt? It's not like they're unknown.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists