[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100120145822.GB3434@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:58:22 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: mtosatti@...hat.com, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm: fix spurious interrupt with irqfd
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 04:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:42:50PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/13/2010 07:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Deassigning irqfd and assigning back caused spurious interrupt. fix this
>>>> by clearing the counter on deassign. This is on top of davidel's patch
>>>> which makes clearing eventfd counter from modules possible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Applied both, thanks.
>>>
>> Hmm, I see this in kvm master. Avi/Marcelo, since this is a bugfix, can
>> you queue this patchset for 2.6.33 and 2.6.32 stable as well please?
>>
>
> I'm uncomfortable with pushing Davide's patch into stable and possibly
> causing regressions with unrelated applications. Can't a guest live
> with a spurious interrupt?
Well guests mask/unmask vector on each interrupt, so this will trigger
an irq storm I think.
> It's not like they're unknown.
Depends on the device really.
In theory, if they trigger at an unfortunate time this could cause
crashes.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists