linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v1 0/2] Human readable performance event description in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1263996979.4283.1066.camel@laptop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:16:19 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...ochip.com>, jpihet@...sta.com,
	p.osciak@...sung.com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Tomasz Fujak <t.fujak@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v1 0/2] Human readable performance event
 description in sysfs

On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 15:09 +0100, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:01:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > It seems to me userspace might care about the exact platform they're
> > running on.
> 
> In my humble opinion, user space should never care about platform it's
> running on.  Interfaces provided by kernel should suffice to implement
> abstraction layer between user space and hardware.  If we abandon that
> we're back in DOS times.  But hey, again, that's just my opinion.

Well, you're completely right. But the often sad reality is that perfect
abstraction is either impossible or prohibitively expensive.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/