[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263997609.4283.1067.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:26:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...ochip.com>, jpihet@...sta.com,
p.osciak@...sung.com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
mingo@...e.hu, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tomasz Fujak <t.fujak@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v1 0/2] Human readable performance event
description in sysfs
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 15:16 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 15:09 +0100, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:01:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > It seems to me userspace might care about the exact platform they're
> > > running on.
> >
> > In my humble opinion, user space should never care about platform it's
> > running on. Interfaces provided by kernel should suffice to implement
> > abstraction layer between user space and hardware. If we abandon that
> > we're back in DOS times. But hey, again, that's just my opinion.
>
> Well, you're completely right. But the often sad reality is that perfect
> abstraction is either impossible or prohibitively expensive.
And then there is the simple matter of knowing what kind of box it is
without having to resort to a screwdriver or worse.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists