linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:06:47 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Carsten Emde <cbe@...dl.org>,
	Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@...he.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant

On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:58 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when
> a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this.
> 
> Thanks and Kudos go to Mathias Weber and Carsten Emde for analysis,
> test cases and initial workaround patches.

These look fine to me,

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/