| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <520f0cf11001201359h660a3b5auabfd2efc162398d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:59:58 +0100 From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Carsten Emde <cbe@...dl.org>, Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@...he.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:58 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when >> a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this. >> >> Thanks and Kudos go to Mathias Weber and Carsten Emde for analysis, >> test cases and initial workaround patches. Oh, that sounds good - would you like to share the test cases for our rt-test suite? > > These look fine to me, > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists