[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100120220023.GC4141@jeremy-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:00:23 -0800
From:	Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
To:	Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
Cc:	zhou peng <ailvpeng25@...il.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About ACL for IPC Object
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:50:48PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:20:00PM +0800, zhou peng wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > There are ACL in file system, but why there are no ACL implementation
> > in IPC object, eg. shm, message queue, FIFO?
> > Is there any fine grained granting in ipc object just like in file object?
> 
> Not implemented yet, we can add this if you need it
> (but probably will be a 3.6.0 feature).
Never mind, got my lists mixed up and thought this
was a Samba request (sorry :-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
