linux-kernel - Re: About ACL for IPC Object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100120215048.GB4141@jeremy-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:50:48 -0800
From:	Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
To:	zhou peng <ailvpeng25@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About ACL for IPC Object

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:20:00PM +0800, zhou peng wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> There are ACL in file system, but why there are no ACL implementation
> in IPC object, eg. shm, message queue, FIFO?
> Is there any fine grained granting in ipc object just like in file object?

Not implemented yet, we can add this if you need it
(but probably will be a 3.6.0 feature).

Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/