[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264023204.4283.1124.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:33:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Terpstra <terpstra@...s.utk.edu>,
Philip Mucci <mucci@...s.utk.edu>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>, Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:34 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So how about PERF_TYPE_{CORE,NODE,SOCKET} like things?
OK, so I read most of the intel uncore stuff, and it seems to suggest
you need a regular pmu event to receive uncore events (chained setup),
this seems rather retarded since it wastes a perfectly good pmu event
and makes configuring all this more intricate...
A well, nothing to be done about that I guess..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists