linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] eventfd: allow atomic read and waitqueue remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100121180250.GJ16707@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:02:50 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] eventfd: allow atomic read and waitqueue remove

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/21/2010 07:56 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/21/2010 07:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> But you're in process context.  An eventfd never blocks.
>>> Yes it blocks if counter is 0. And we don't know
>>> it's not 0 unless we read :) catch-22.
>>
>> Ah yes, I forgot.
>>
>
> Well, you can poll it and then read it... this introduces a new race (if  
> userspace does a read in parallel) but it's limited to kvm and buggy  
> userspace.

I would rather not require that userspace never reads this fd.
You are right that it does not now, but adding this as requirement
looks like exporting an implementation bug to userspace.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/