[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B5C29BC.4050109@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:06:36 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] eventfd: allow atomic read and waitqueue remove
On 01/21/2010 08:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 01/21/2010 07:56 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/21/2010 07:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> But you're in process context. An eventfd never blocks.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes it blocks if counter is 0. And we don't know
>>>> it's not 0 unless we read :) catch-22.
>>>>
>>> Ah yes, I forgot.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, you can poll it and then read it... this introduces a new race (if
>> userspace does a read in parallel) but it's limited to kvm and buggy
>> userspace.
>>
> I would rather not require that userspace never reads this fd.
> You are right that it does not now, but adding this as requirement
> looks like exporting an implementation bug to userspace.
>
Well, I don't like risking 2.6.32 non-kvm users for a bug that doesn't
happen in practice now.
After it gets some time in 2.6.33, we can backport it to 2.6.32 (since
that will be maintained long term).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists