linux-kernel - NFS_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, adkulkar@...il.iu.edu
Subject: NFS_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL?

Hi,

there's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile 
NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard 
Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, 
this won't happen.

I'd like to know if the EXPERIMENTAL tag is still needed for these 
options and if so, what would be needed to remove this tag. Removing this 
tag would allow Ubuntu to include these features into its kernel, possibly 
allowing an even greater userbase to test these features, hopefully providing 
feedback.

Thanks,
Christian.

[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5
-- 
BOFH excuse #259:

Someone's tie is caught in the printer, and if anything else gets printed, he'll be in it too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/