linux-kernel - Re: NFS_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100123143040.49f47e0d@infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:30:40 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
	adkulkar@...il.iu.edu
Subject: Re: NFS_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL?

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> there's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile 
> NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard 
> Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on
> EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen.


since the EXPERIMENTAL flag more or less means nothing, the
"it is marked with the flag so we don't do it" is reasoning based on
more or less nothing...

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/