[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100125162647.GC3749@hack>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:26:47 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: zhou peng <ailvpeng25@...il.com>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
jra@...ba.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About ACL for IPC Object
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:21:44PM +0800, zhou peng wrote:
>I have tested posix sem,posix shm and posix msg queue for ACL on
>fedora 12 with kernel 2.6.32.
>
>Posix sem and posix shm using tmpfs monted by default support ACL well .
>Posix msg queue use mqueue fs mounted by manual but it seem not
>surpoort ACL well. It failed for setting named ACL item:
>{
> $ mkdir /dev/mqueue
> $ mount -o rw, acl -t mqueue none /dev/mqueue
> $cd /dev/mqueue
> "/mq" msg queue object created and used by processes properly
>
> $getfacl mq
> #file: mq
> #owner:root
> #group:root
> user:rw-
> group::---
> other::---
>
> $setfacl -m u:testuser:rw mq /* failed here*/
> $setfacl: mq :Operation not supported
> but mqueue fs works well for setting owner user and owner group items.
>}
>
>I am not sure whether mqueue don't support acl or I make mistake.
>
A quick look at the source code shows mqueue doesn't support ACL.
--
Live like a child, think like the god.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists