[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100125222139.GF5087@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:21:41 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to
notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:51:27PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > >> Such a behaviour shouldn't be affected by the above change...your
> > >> confirmation would help!
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi Jan,
> > > I presume that the above explanation makes the role of this
> > > patch/bugfix clear.
> > >
> > > Kindly let me know if you have any further queries.
> > >
> >
> > Nope. There should be really no conflicts of your optimization with kvm.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > --
>
> Hi Jan,
> Thanks for the confirmation.
>
> Hi Frederic,
> Can you pull these fixes in? (LKML references:
> 20091226182725.GB9494@...ibm.com and 20091226182833.GC9494@...ibm.com).
I got a deeper look at these patches and answered with some comments.
If you address these, I can apply for .34 (because it's about optimizations
and not fixes).
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists