[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100126162730.GI19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:27:30 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:16:55AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> --- security-testing-2.6.orig/init/main.c
> +++ security-testing-2.6/init/main.c
> @@ -663,9 +663,9 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> proc_caches_init();
> buffer_init();
> key_init();
> + radix_tree_init();
> security_init();
> vfs_caches_init(totalram_pages);
> - radix_tree_init();
> signals_init();
> /* rootfs populating might need page-writeback */
> page_writeback_init();
FWIW, I'd take radix_tree_init() much earlier than that; it's a common
infrastructure and if we have it early it'll mean less headache.
AFAICS, it can go right after mm_init(). Objections, anyone?
Other than that, I'm OK with that one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists