[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1264543261.3556.1.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:01 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 13:03 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> OK, this stuff is in for-next, with the following changes:
> * nfsd call has been moved to nfsd_open()
> * patches reordered
> * masking irrelevant bits (i.e. leaving only MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC})
> has been taken to ima_path_check(); all callers do it and it's safer that
> way anyway.
>
> Please, see if it's OK with you in this form; other calls of dentry_open()
> are separate story, we'll have to see which ones should and which ones
> should not get ima_path_check(). Do you have any other problems with that
> one? If not, it's going to migrate into for-linus and into the mainline;
> this stuff is definitely 2.6.33 fodder.
Other than missing the export for ima_path_check() for nfs and the
re-ordering not being bisect safe, they look good. I've updated
the following two patches, from Eric's patchset, and would appreciate
your applying them as well:
ima: rename ima_path_check to ima_file_check
ima: rename PATH_CHECK to FILE_CHECK
Posting them separately.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists