[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100127130013.GA16698@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:00:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14657] perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> (I am CC'ing some more perf folks.)
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. ?Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657
> > Subject ? ? ? ? : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7
> > Submitter ? ? ? : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
> > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2009-11-19 19:50 (67 days old)
> > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4
>
> Is this bug still valid?
Ought to be fixed by:
8f06d7e: perf timechart: Use tid not pid for COMM change
But i'd like Arjan to confirm this before we can strike this from the list of
regressions.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists