linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #14657] perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100127073101.04518085@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:31:01 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14657] perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:00:13 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> 
> > (I am CC'ing some more perf folks.)
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a
> > > report of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> > > regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. ?Please verify
> > > if it still should be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657
> > > Subject ? ? ? ? : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7
> > > Submitter ? ? ? : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2009-11-19 19:50 (67 days old)
> > > References ? ? ?:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4
> > 
> > Is this bug still valid?
> 
> Ought to be fixed by:
> 
>  8f06d7e: perf timechart: Use tid not pid for COMM change


nope independent from this bug.

this bug is about powertop not getting all events it expects


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/