[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100128154646.GW4472@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:46 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, aris@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [RFC][x86] move notify_die from nmi.c to traps.c
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:10:25PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:03:40PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > index 3339917..3b98dd3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -400,6 +400,11 @@ static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > if (notify_die(DIE_NMI_IPI, "nmi_ipi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT)
> > == NOTIFY_STOP)
> > return;
> > +
> > + if (notify_die(DIE_NMI, "nmi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT)
> > + == NOTIFY_STOP)
> > + return;
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> > /*
> > * Ok, so this is none of the documented NMI sources,
> > --
>
> Hi Don, I suppose this notify_die should be in CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> section?
To maintain old behaviour I suppose, yes. Personally I don't think
notify_die has anything to do with CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC so I put it in
above the #define.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists