linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100130174516.2257d7fa@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:45:16 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	vedran.furac@...il.com
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, rientjes@...gle.com,
	minchan.kim@...il.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling

> I can't say I'm able to correctly read kernel code, but I believe
> default is set by:

It['s set by the distribution - the kerne has a default value but given
the same distributions are shipping the crap userspace that breaks with
no-overcommit do you think they'll set it to break their user apps ?

No.

> http://vedranf.net/tmp/oom.ogv  (you can watch it using VLC for example)
> 
> Actually anyone receiving this mail should see it. What do you think,
> what will customers rather choose if they see this?

Address that to the distributions. Their customers. Systems I set up for
people always have no overcommit enabled.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/