[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6477C7.70508@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:17:43 +0100
From: Vedran Furač <vedran.furac@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, rientjes@...gle.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling
Alan Cox wrote:
>> http://vedranf.net/tmp/oom.ogv (you can watch it using VLC for example)
>>
>> Actually anyone receiving this mail should see it. What do you think,
>> what will customers rather choose if they see this?
>
> Address that to the distributions. Their customers. Systems I set up for
> people always have no overcommit enabled.
And distros say that's a bug in kernel. Result: nothing gets done and
users will continue to swear at linux after it kills their work...
--
http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12
View attachment "vedran_furac.vcf" of type "text/x-vcard" (220 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists