[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264883863.13861.3.camel@maxim-laptop>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:37:43 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was:
Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 30 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 01:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I thing the snippet below is a good summary of what this is about.
> >
> > Any progress on that?
>
> Well, I'm waiting for you to report back:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/74740/
>
> The patch is appended once again for convenience.
Ah, sorry!
I used the second version (with the locks) and it works for sure (~500
cycles)
However, as I discovered today, it takes the lock also for GFP_ATOMIC,
and thats why I see several backtraces in the kernel log. Anyway this
isn't important.
I forgot all about this patch, and I am compiling the kernel right away.
Will put the kernel through the hibernate loop tonight.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists