linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2674af741001312112k517ed073w51e66a907438f301@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:12:39 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	rusty <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt_rq

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:56 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> member rt_se of struct rt_rq is a duplicate of tg->rt_se[cpu].
>> So we can remove one of them. After checking CFS, I think
>> rt_rq->rt_se can be removed for some kinds of consistence.
>
> Looks good I think.

Hi Peter,

Seems nobody has objection on the two patches.
Can you pick them up?
Or should I resend the patchset again?

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/