linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1265016096.24455.108.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:21:36 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	rusty <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt_rq

On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:12 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:56 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >> member rt_se of struct rt_rq is a duplicate of tg->rt_se[cpu].
> >> So we can remove one of them. After checking CFS, I think
> >> rt_rq->rt_se can be removed for some kinds of consistence.
> >
> > Looks good I think.
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Seems nobody has objection on the two patches.
> Can you pick them up?

I'll take them, thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/