[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:55:45 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:34:24 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>
> The way I've always read that was that you'd found a build failure in
> a given bit of the tree while testing -next - you're clearly doing some
> work to identify and understand where the failure came from (and simply
> looking at the source file leads to the same result normally anyway) so
> the fact that you've identified the subsystem doesn't automatically say
> that this happened with a partially merged -next. If you looked less
> like a human the subject by itself would be clearer :)
How about "linux-next: build failure after merging xxx tree"?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists