[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:36:51 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
On Monday 01 February 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +/*
> + * Get/set the personality.
> + *
> + * Note that we simply return PER_LINUX even if we actually have a 32-bit
> + * task (PER_LINUX32) as this is expected by 32-bit userland.
> + */
> SYSCALL_DEFINE1(personality, u_long, personality)
> {
> u_long old = current->personality;
>
> if (personality != 0xffffffff) {
> + if (personality(old) == PER_LINUX32 &&
> + personality == PER_LINUX)
> + personality = PER_LINUX32;
> set_personality(personality);
> if (current->personality != personality)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return (long)old;
> + return (long)(old == PER_LINUX32 ? PER_LINUX : old);
> }
What does this do for a native 64 bit process setting PER_LINUX32?
It looks to me like it could never set it back to the original
value, or am I missing something here?
It's what the arch specific code does already, but it seems a bit
strange anyway.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists