[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:31:45 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:36:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > - return (long)old;
> > + return (long)(old == PER_LINUX32 ? PER_LINUX : old);
> > }
>
> What does this do for a native 64 bit process setting PER_LINUX32?
> It looks to me like it could never set it back to the original
> value, or am I missing something here?
>
> It's what the arch specific code does already, but it seems a bit
> strange anyway.
Indeed, this prevents a process from going back to 64bit. And while
the setarch tool in util-linux also allows going back to 64-bit the
typical use case seems to be going into 32-bit mode.
But if the consensus is that we should fix this properly I can
replace the patch with one introducing a compat_sys_personality
which only gets used for compat tasks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists