[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265212054.24455.680.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:47:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for
hweight_long(CONSTANT)
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 07:42 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:15:57 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 07:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:39:51 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there an official lowest GCC version that Linux supports?
> > >
> > > Documentation/Changes says gcc-3.2.
> >
> > Anyway, its not like that macro I used isn't straight forward. Not much
> > a builtin can do better.
> >
> > The only benefit the builtin has is possibly use machine popcnt
> > instructions but we already deal with that in the kernel.
>
> We didn't deal with it on every architecture, which is something which
> the compiler extension takes care of.
>
> In fact I can't find anywhere where we dealt with it on x86.
>>From what I know the popcnt ins on x86 is relatively new, hpa was going
to look at supporting it using alternatives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists