[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B69ADFB.9070502@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:10:19 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT)
On 02/03/2010 05:39 AM, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>
>> (I wonder if it could have used __builtin_popcount)
>>
>> (I wonder which gcc versions support __builtin_popcount)
>
I think 4.0 or later, but it often generates calls to libgcc, which
would mean adding libgcc functions to the kernel (which some arches
already do.)
> This is how Jamie Lokier first recommended it to me:
>
> Checked GCC 3.4.3 / 4.1 / 4.4: It expands as a compile-time
> constant if the argument is a compile-time constant, so can be
> used in BUILD_BUG_ON() and even for array sizes etc.
>
> Is there an official lowest GCC version that Linux supports?
3.4, I believe.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists