linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sky2: receive dma mapping error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100203102558.75d7a919@nehalam>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:25:58 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Cc:	Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	flyboy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	Don Fry <pcnet32@...izon.net>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2:  receive dma mapping error handling

On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:23:01 -0800
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com> wrote:

> On 02/03/10 09:07, Michael Breuer wrote:
> > On 02/03/2010 11:56 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:19 -0500
> >> Michael Breuer<mbreuer@...jas.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Tracked this down. The status being returned is 0x3c0080 - good flow
> >>> control packets. Nothing is actually being dropped (confirmed by packet
> >>> trace on switch compared with packet trace on server).
> >>>
> >>> I whipped up a trivial patch to not count these as dropped packets and
> >>> will post to netdev.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not really sure what the driver should be doing in this case, but
> >>> resubmit seems to work.
> >> Looks like a flow control negotiation issue. You probably turned off
> >> flow control on the Linux side, but the switch is still doing flow
> >> control.
> >>
> > According to the driver:
> > Feb 3 12:03:02 mail kernel: sky2 eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full
> > duplex, flow control both
> >
> > So if the rx flow control packet status is due to flow control being
> > disabled, then there's a different issue.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> 
> 
> hmm.. after an hour or so I'm not seeing anything.
> from what I remember I turned the machine on in the
> hotel, then left the system there as I went out for a few hours
> (so maybe I need to wait).
> 
> Anyways I did keep dmesg of when this occurred, basically
> the log was spammed with these:
> 
> [  863.294057] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88
> [  865.646645] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 1286.420471] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 1286.499459] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 1746.903826] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 1754.263692] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 1755.309360] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104
> [ 2213.256294] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 2219.653342] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88
> [ 2221.673601] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 2679.654655] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104
> [ 2692.315058] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x500002 length 80
> [ 2694.349612] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x580002 length 88
> [ 2703.676717] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x700002 length 112
> [ 2703.826375] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 3187.504843] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 3189.560744] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x600002 length 96
> [ 3672.475719] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104
> [ 3676.696959] sky2 eth0: rx error, status 0x680002 length 104
> 
> but while using the system with this, I didn't notice anything
> out of the ordinary.
> (if this fires off I can try a bisect for you guys, but right now
> since I'm not seeing anything, might be a different story);
> 

You were on a crappy hotel switch. Those are all CRC errors.



-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/