linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sky2: receive dma mapping error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4B68F664.6050007@majjas.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:07:00 -0500
From:	Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	flyboy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	Don Fry <pcnet32@...izon.net>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2:  receive dma mapping error handling

On 2/1/2010 1:20 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This fixes the fact that re->flags is always zero without causing
> other confusion.
>
> --- a/drivers/net/sky2.c	2010-02-01 10:07:42.676296236 -0800
> +++ b/drivers/net/sky2.c	2010-02-01 10:18:12.575044064 -0800
> @@ -1025,11 +1025,8 @@ static void sky2_prefetch_init(struct sk
>   static inline struct sky2_tx_le *get_tx_le(struct sky2_port *sky2, u16 *slot)
>   {
>   	struct sky2_tx_le *le = sky2->tx_le + *slot;
> -	struct tx_ring_info *re = sky2->tx_ring + *slot;
>
>   	*slot = RING_NEXT(*slot, sky2->tx_ring_size);
> -	re->flags = 0;
> -	re->skb = NULL;
>   	le->ctrl = 0;
>   	return le;
>   }
> @@ -1622,8 +1619,7 @@ static unsigned tx_le_req(const struct s
>   	return count;
>   }
>
> -static void sky2_tx_unmap(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> -			  const struct tx_ring_info *re)
> +static void sky2_tx_unmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct tx_ring_info *re)
>   {
>   	if (re->flags&  TX_MAP_SINGLE)
>   		pci_unmap_single(pdev, pci_unmap_addr(re, mapaddr),
> @@ -1633,6 +1629,7 @@ static void sky2_tx_unmap(struct pci_dev
>   		pci_unmap_page(pdev, pci_unmap_addr(re, mapaddr),
>   			       pci_unmap_len(re, maplen),
>   			       PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> +	re->flags = 0;
>   }
>
>   /*
> @@ -1839,6 +1836,7 @@ static void sky2_tx_complete(struct sky2
>   			dev->stats.tx_packets++;
>   			dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
>
> +			re->skb = NULL;
>   			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>
>   			sky2->tx_next = RING_NEXT(idx, sky2->tx_ring_size);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>    
Just a brief update - this has been up and stable for about 32 hours - 
I've been periodically generating load on the system. No kernel errors 
of any sort so far. Actually, in retrospect, I believe the dma issue was 
triggering other bad things - including an rcu lockup (patched in tip - 
sched.c).

Just as an FYI - (and this should probably be in a new thread) I am 
seeing an large number (>9,000,000) of dropped rx packets, however at 
this time I see no errors resulting from that (on this or client 
machines). As the # of dropped packets hasn't incremented at any time I 
was observing things, I can't say what this is about. Probably nothing, 
but I'll see if I can track down what is going on. I did see some of 
this earlier on while troubleshooting the sky2 issues that now seem 
resolved.  Quick crosschecking of other machines do not show high error 
or retransmission rates. I'm also not seeing any evidence of other 
errors (no errors reported by ifconfig, or ethtool, or printk (debug is 
enabled).

I'm wondering whether these dropped packets are due mostly to hitting 
GMR_FS_RX_OK in sky2_receive. I'm also guessing that the high numbers of 
this that I'm seeing is an artifact of being able to pump more traffic 
through with the above patch. Given the description of the status code 
in sky2.h (receive ok) I'm wondering whether a) this should be reported 
as dropped, b) whether resubmit is necessary, c) whether it's possible 
that eth1 events coinciding with eth0 events are the cause and d) 
whether or not there's another issue entirely.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/