[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100202.172710.24662176.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:27:10 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: jarkao2@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, mbreuer@...jas.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, flyboy@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mchan@...adcom.com, pcnet32@...izon.net, romieu@...zoreil.com,
mcarlson@...adcom.com, James.Bottomley@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Fix WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:902 check_sync
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:18:39 +0900
> Can we safely assume that the arch implementations already round
> up/down to the safe boundary internally in this API (they should
> already)?
I can only speak for sparc64 and x86 directly and those are fine.
Any such improper implementations would fail with many common
ethernet drivers already.
> I don't like two DMA docs. I like to make pci_dma_* API obsolete. We
> have the generic DMA API with generic devices so we are always able to
> use the API (as you did with sbus_map_*). The majority arch
> implementations safely call the bus specific DMA functions via the
> generic DMA API. So there are not many things to do. We can just
> convert pci_dma_* to dma_* API slowly.
>
> Opinions?
I have no problem with this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists