lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:38:10 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hch@....de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures

On Wednesday 03 February 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The x86 method of simply not bothering doesn't seem to have caused
> problems -- our compat (and noncompat) tasks happily return PER_LINUX32
> if that is the mode and we don't seem to have had complaints with it.
> If userspace ever had an issue with it -- and they might have, at one
> point in history libc used to call personality() during startup, which
> it doesn't seem to anymore -- they presumably have worked through it.
> 
> As such, I'm more than a little reluctant to change the current behavior.

I think it would be better to have a consistent behavior across
architectures, so /something/ should be changed. On x86, the unused
sys32_personality function can probable just be removed, if nothing
else.

If we can get everyone to agree with the x86 way of handling this,
we can also remove all the special cases for sys32_personality in the
other architectures.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ