[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100204160057.GA5120@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:57 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hch@....de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:38:10AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I think it would be better to have a consistent behavior across
> architectures, so /something/ should be changed. On x86, the unused
> sys32_personality function can probable just be removed, if nothing
> else.
>
> If we can get everyone to agree with the x86 way of handling this,
> we can also remove all the special cases for sys32_personality in the
> other architectures.
Yes, this should be common over architectures. Anyway, I expect there
to be some discussion until we've reached that point, so for now I'll
rebase patches 5 and 6 to not require this patch, and will send one
to kill the unused x86 implementation. Whatever is the final outcome
can be implemented on top.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists