[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265299457.22001.72.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:04:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for
hweight_long(CONSTANT)
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:54 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:13:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > hweight_long() isn't an arch primitive, only __arch_hweight{8,16,32,64}
> > are.
>
> Yeah, I'm still looking for the proper location. hweight_long() is the
> generic version so do we want to do the
>
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_POPCNT
> static inline unsigned long hweight_long(unsigned long w)
> ....
>
> #endif
>
> thing and define a x86-specific version?
No, just don't touch hweight_long(), simply provide
__arch_hweight{8,16,32,64} and all will be well.
hweight_long() is provided by <include/linux.h> and is constructed from
height32() and hweight64() depending on the actual word size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists