[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100305114911.ef629eb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:49:11 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:00:57 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:38:10AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I think it would be better to have a consistent behavior across
> > architectures, so /something/ should be changed. On x86, the unused
> > sys32_personality function can probable just be removed, if nothing
> > else.
> >
> > If we can get everyone to agree with the x86 way of handling this,
> > we can also remove all the special cases for sys32_personality in the
> > other architectures.
>
> Yes, this should be common over architectures. Anyway, I expect there
> to be some discussion until we've reached that point, so for now I'll
> rebase patches 5 and 6 to not require this patch, and will send one
> to kill the unused x86 implementation. Whatever is the final outcome
> can be implemented on top.
>
This never happened?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists