linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100309125817.GA18435@lst.de>
Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:58:17 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] improve sys_personality for compat architectures

On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:49:11AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Yes, this should be common over architectures.  Anyway, I expect there
> > to be some discussion until we've reached that point, so for now I'll
> > rebase patches 5 and 6 to not require this patch, and will send one
> > to kill the unused x86 implementation.  Whatever is the final outcome
> > can be implemented on top.
> > 
> 
> This never happened?

Seems like no one cared enough to discuss this issue in detail.  I'll
start a fresh discussion once we got the other patches in and I have
a clean sheet to work against.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/