linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] emulate accessed bit for EPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:47:15 +0100
From:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jdike@...toit.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emulate accessed bit for EPT

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I suspect it won't be very many. I have been monitoring
> /proc/meminfo on my system while testing this patch, and
> it is quite typical that the size of the inactive anon
> list does not change for minutes at a time.
> 
> In other words, no pages are moved onto or off of the
> inactive anon list for several minutes. That corresponds
> to a very small number of minor faults introduced by my
> patch.

When there's light VM pressure, ideally there should be zero overhead
caused by the patch. When there is VM pressure this will avoid some
unnecessary I/O which should outweight the minor faults. It should be
a good default behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/