[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100205173422.GA14706@amt.cnet>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:34:23 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jdike@...toit.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emulate accessed bit for EPT
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:47:15PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > I suspect it won't be very many. I have been monitoring
> > /proc/meminfo on my system while testing this patch, and
> > it is quite typical that the size of the inactive anon
> > list does not change for minutes at a time.
> >
> > In other words, no pages are moved onto or off of the
> > inactive anon list for several minutes. That corresponds
> > to a very small number of minor faults introduced by my
> > patch.
>
> When there's light VM pressure, ideally there should be zero overhead
> caused by the patch. When there is VM pressure this will avoid some
> unnecessary I/O which should outweight the minor faults. It should be
> a good default behavior.
Agree.
But perhaps a module parameter to turn accessed bit emulation off might
be handy in the future?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists