[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6BE443.5000307@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:26:27 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>, tao.ma@...cle.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: Fix contiguousness check in ocfs2_try_to_merge_extent_map()
The wrong member was compared in the continguousness check.
Acked-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
>> } else if ((ins->ei_phys + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys &&
>> (ins->ei_cpos + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys &&
>> should that 2nd emi->ei_phys be emi->ei_cpos?
> oh, yes, you are right. Do you want to provide a patch?
Here, I added your ack.
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
index d35a27f..5328529 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int ocfs2_try_to_merge_extent_map(struct ocfs2_extent_map_item *emi,
emi->ei_clusters += ins->ei_clusters;
return 1;
} else if ((ins->ei_phys + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys &&
- (ins->ei_cpos + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys &&
+ (ins->ei_cpos + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_cpos &&
ins->ei_flags == emi->ei_flags) {
emi->ei_phys = ins->ei_phys;
emi->ei_cpos = ins->ei_cpos;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists