[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002051405.54029.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:05:53 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
On Friday 05 February 2010 06:45:38 you wrote:
> Again, using bitmap algorithm is not a problem and it's better, the
> problem is sysctl interface, how would you plan to interact with users
> via sysctl/proc if you use bitmap to handle this? I would like to hear
> more details about this.
>
We could use something like positive values for setting and negative for reset
(e.g. 3 would set the port in the bitmap and -3 would reset it).
But we would need new sysctl and proc handlers to handle the bitmap case (e.g.
sysctl_bitmap, proc_dobitmap_minmax).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists