[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201002051428.12767.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:28:12 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
On Friday 05 February 2010 08:01:43 you wrote:
> >> If you can accept his version, I want to use his version (with an
> >> interface for updating above "reserved_ports" by not only root user's
> >> sysctl() but also MAC's policy configuration).
> >
> > I think that simply using an interface to update the reserved_ports from
> > MAC policy configuration module wouldn't work, as root will be able to
> > modify the policy via sysctl.
> >
> > I think that we might need to:
> >
> > a) have a reserved_port updater
> >
> > b) put a LSM hook into that
> >
> > c) use the reserved_port updater from sysctl
>
> Ideally, you'd provide an interface for port allocator to use, so
> doing port reservation will be easier.
>
If I understand the TOMOYO requirements correctly, we need a way to restrict a
user action based on some security policy (in this case the ability to clear
reserved ports). Traditionally that has been done with LSM hooks, so I think
that approach is preferable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists